Agent Skills Directory

MUST USE for ANY git operations. Atomic commits, rebase/squash, history search (blame, bisect, log -S). STRONGLY RECOMMENDED: Use with task(category='quick', load_skills=['git-master'], ...) to save context. Triggers: 'commit', 'rebase', 'squash', 'who wrote', 'when was X added', 'find the commit that'.

Read-only GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. 1 item = 1 background task (category: quick). Analyzes all open items and writes evidence-backed reports to /tmp/{datetime}/. Every claim requires a GitHub permalink as proof. NEVER takes any action on GitHub - no comments, no merges, no closes, no labels. Reports only. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.

Explains any senpi tip in depth, including Tip: lines in the TUI. Use when the user asks about a tip, what a tipped feature does, or which tips they can see.

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.

Adversarial multi-agent planning: a hostile team cross-critiques a plan before it is formalized. Use when planning needs maximum rigor or the user asks for a hyperplan / adversarial or cross-critique plan.

Initializes a hierarchical AGENTS.md knowledge base for a project. Use when a repo needs its structure, commands, and conventions documented for agents.

Initializes a hierarchical AGENTS.md knowledge base for a project. Use when a repo needs its structure, commands, and conventions documented for agents.

Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect.

Diagnose LazyCodex and Codex CLI installation health against the latest sources. Use whenever the user asks for a doctor or health check, says LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, or Codex behaves oddly after an install, update, or config change, suspects a stale, drifted, or broken setup, or wants the local install audited and compared with the latest LazyCodex and Codex code.

Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance, and GitHub routing.

Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.

Configures a language server so editor/agent tooling (diagnostics, go-to-definition, references, rename) works. Use when a project needs an LSP installed or wired, or a 'no LSP server configured' error appears.

Drives dependency-ordered child work through the native workflow tool, each phase's stages defined up front in one run, with retry/amend/send recovery. Use when the user asks for mass-ulw, a DAG of tasks, or fan-out work where some tasks must wait on others.

Easter egg command - about oh-my-opencode. Triggers: omomomo, about, easter egg.

Guides a first-time omo user through setup and the core workflow. Use when a new user asks to get started with omo.

QA opencode itself, per case: verify the CLI/terminal (opencode run, db, serve, export), prove a specific plugin hook/action/event fired via the SSE event stream, smoke-test the TUI under tmux, and investigate sessions in opencode's SQLite DB by id, title/name, or message text. Ships tested helper scripts (each with a --self-test) plus per-domain references. Use whenever someone wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug opencode's CLI, HTTP server, plugin hooks/events, or TUI, or to find/inspect opencode sessions in the database. Triggers: opencode qa, qa opencode, test opencode, verify opencode hook, opencode session db, find opencode session by id/name/text, opencode tui test, opencode server health, opencode event stream.

Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.

Applies strict, modern language practice (typed errors, exhaustive match, tests that can fail) for Python, Rust, TypeScript, and Go. Use for work on .py, .rs, .ts, or .go files.

Publish oh-my-opencode to npm by triggering the GitHub Actions publish workflow and verifying its artifacts. Ship-only: never runs pre-publish-review or re-reviews merged code unless the user explicitly asks. Argument: <patch|minor|major|explicit-semver>. Triggers: publish, release, deploy, npm publish.

Guides a refactor, cleanup, or restructure with the right decomposition. Use when the user asks to refactor, simplify, extract, or modernize code.

Removes AI-generated code smells from branch changes or an explicit file list behind regression tests. Use when the user asks to clean up, deslop, or remove AI-slop patterns from recent changes.

Remove unused code from this project with ultrawork mode, LSP-verified safety, atomic commits. Triggers: remove dead code, dead code, cleanup, remove unused.

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

Use when the user asks about Codex Rules behavior, injected project rules, supported rule file locations, matching, or environment configuration.

Team Mode security research skill. Orchestrates 3 vulnerability hunters and 2 PoC engineers to audit a codebase in parallel, prove exploitability, classify root causes, and calibrate severity by actual exploitability. Use for security review, vulnerability research, exploitability audit, pre-release security check, threat model validation, and `/security-research`. Triggers: 'security-research', 'security research', 'security review', 'vulnerability audit', 'exploitability audit', '보안 리뷰', '취약점 감사'.

QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/<slug>/. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPI_CODING_AGENT_DIR and ignore the caller's, so the real ~/.senpi/agent is never written. Ships scripts/resolve-evidence-dir.mjs, which is the ONLY sanctioned way to pick an evidence directory: it rejects traversal, separators, absolute paths, and stray roots such as local-ignore/qa-evidence. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-senpi or packages/senpi-task, or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Senpi adapter, the task/team engine, the DAG, task RPC, or skill delivery. Triggers: senpi qa, qa senpi, senpi-qa, test senpi adapter, verify senpi task, senpi task e2e, senpi team e2e, task dag qa, live senpi driver, senpi evidence path.

Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

Reaches web pages the user's browser cannot open: WAF-blocked and bot-scored hosts, platform-native readers (Chinese and social platforms), archive snapshots with provenance, and a browser you own for stealth or throwaway profiles. Not for plain search, an unblocked static fetch, or a page the user's browser can open.

The binding ultrawork-mode directive. This file IS the directive; read it only when ultrawork mode is requested and the directive is not already in the conversation.

Executes a written ulw-plan work plan with Boulder state, evidence ledger, worktree discipline, and parallel subagents. Use when the user says ulw-execute or asks to run a .omo/plans plan.

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.

Explore-first planning consultant that writes one decision-complete work plan before coding. Use only on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow or a plan before implementation; it never self-activates on a bare ulw run.

Explore-first planning consultant that writes one decision-complete work plan before coding. Use only on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow or a plan before implementation; it never self-activates on a bare ulw run.

Runs maximum-saturation research with a cooperating team, claim-graph gating, and a cited, QA'd deliverable. Use when the user explicitly asks for research or a deep investigation, including any 'ulw' research wording.

Runs maximum-saturation research with a cooperating team, claim-graph gating, and a cited, QA'd deliverable. Use when the user explicitly asks for research or a deep investigation, including any 'ulw' research wording.

Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces: an Apple HIG-based checklist, paired light/dark captures at phone and desktop widths, screenshot evidence, and a per-item PASS/FAIL verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right or follows the platform's design guidelines.

Builds a self-contained HTML page (chart, table, diagram, dashboard) to show inline in a thread. Use before calling show_html_page, html_preview or html_render, or whenever an answer reads better as a page than as prose.

Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the smallest atomic, independently-mergeable PRs and builds the independent ones concurrently via one worktree per PR driven by parallel subagents or a team. Unbounded loop: any failing gate sends you back to fix-and-re-QA inside that PR's worktree. Use whenever implementation work needs to land as a PR. Triggers: 'create a PR', 'implement and PR', 'work on this and make a PR', 'implement issue', 'land this as a PR', 'split into atomic PRs', 'parallel PRs', 'work-with-pr', 'PR workflow', 'implement end to end', even when user just says 'implement X' if the context implies PR delivery.

MUST read before searching X/Twitter with the x_search tool. When xAI is connected: date-bound every time-sensitive query (from_date >= yesterday, widen to 7 days), scope trusted accounts with allowed_x_handles, phrase queries as latest/recent with since:/from:/filter: operators, split into 2-3 searches by account and by keyword, and reconcile against web_search. Triggers: X search, Twitter search, tweets, posts on X, what people are saying on X, x_search, social signal.

Leaves sweep through the frame and part to reveal the headline. HyperFrames block, 1920×1080, 12s, 11 variables.

A tiled headline surface flips cell by cell under a sweeping depth field to reveal the rear headline. HyperFrames block, 1920×1080, 8s, 18 variables.

A chain of bevelled cuboids rides a travelling wave as a content carousel. HyperFrames block, 1920×1080, 6.666666666666667s, 40 variables.

An orbiting camera follows an ice logo as it breaks apart, reforms into two text moments, and fades. HyperFrames block, 1920×1080, 22.5s, 216 variables.

Glass shards fly in through fog and tile themselves into the headline. HyperFrames block, 1920×1080, 12.16s, 19 variables.